E-1A3b - Road Transportation
This category can be further broken down for reporting purposes into emissions from:
1A3b.i
- Cars1A3b.i1
- Passenger cars with 3-way catalysts1A3b.i2
- Passenger cars without 3-way catalysts
1A3b.ii
- Light duty trucks1A3b.ii1
- Light duty trucks with 3-way catalysts1A3b.ii2
- Light duty trucks without 3-way catalysts
1A3b.iii
- Heavy duty trucks and buses1A3b.iv
- Motorcycles (including mopeds, scooters, and three-wheelers)1A3b.v
- Evaporative emissions from vehicles1A3bv.i
- Urea-based catalysts
Emissions¶
Emissions for road transportation are defined by the IPCC in section 3.2 of Volume 2 of (Eggleston H.S. et al. 2006)1.
Emission reporting for road transport can be further broken down into:
- \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions (from combustion)
- \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions from urea-based catalysts
- \(\ce{CH4}\) and \(\ce{N2O}\) emissions
They can be estimated from either:
- Fuel consumption (tiers 1 and 2); or
- Vehicle kilometers travelled (tier 3)
\(\ce{CO2}\) emissions¶
Tier 1¶
Emissions are calculated per fuel type (\(a\)) based on the parameter \(Fuel_a\) = quantity of fuel sold, measured in \(TJ\).
Where:
Emission factors calculated as the carbon content of the fuel multiplied by \(44/12\) and are summarised in table 3.2.1 of (Eggleston H.S. et al. 2006)1:
Fuel Type | \(\ce{CO2}\) Emission Factors \((kg/TJ)\) |
---|---|
Motor Gasoline | 69 300 |
Gas / Diesel Oil | 74 100 |
Liquefied Petroleum Gases | 63 100 |
Kerosene | 71 900 |
Lubricants | 73 300 |
Compressed Natural Gas | 56 100 |
Liquefied Natural Gas | 56 100 |
Tier 2¶
Tier 2 calculations use the same equation as for tier 1, however country-specific carbon content per fuel type are used to determine emission factors, instead of relying on the global average values as used in tier 1.
Tier 3¶
The IPCC does not provide a tier 3 approach for estimating emissions of \(\ce{CO2}\) for road transport. This is because, for reporting purposes, it is difficult to improve on the tier 2 equations that use direct fuel consumption data.
A tier 3 approach of estimating emissions from Vehicle Kilometers Travelled (VKT) would be less accurate than the tier 1 and 2 approaches. However, when considering mitigation methods, then estimating VKT may be considered an improvement over tier 1 and 2.
\(\ce{CO2}\) emissions from urea-based catalysts¶
Emissions from the use of urea-based additives are not described with the tier approach, the IPCC present only the following consumption based equation:
Where:
\(\ce{CH4}\) and \(\ce{N2O}\) emissions¶
\(\ce{CH4}\) and \(\ce{N2O}\) emissions are harder to estimate and depend largely on factors such as the distribution of emission control technology in the fleet. For this reason, tier 2 and 3 methods address variations in the fleet as well as driving conditions.
Note: while \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions from biofuels are not required by the IPCC for reporting national totals (as they are biogenic), \(\ce{CH4}\) and \(\ce{N2O}\) emissions from biofuels are considered anthropogenic and should be reported.
Tier 1¶
This approach follows the tier 1 approach for \(\ce{CO2}\) emissions and is base on fuel consumption data, broken down by fuel type:
Where:
Tier 2¶
Tier 2 further breaks down fuel consumption by vehicle type and emission control technology:
Where:
Tier 3¶
Tier 3 improves on the lower tiers by using Vehicle Kilometers Travelled, as well as roughly accounting for the cold-start phase:
Where:
The cold-start phase is roughly estimated to the first 3km travelled per journey and takes into account the fact that catalysts only start to operate when engine temperatures reach 300 C.
Mitigation¶
For mitigation strategies see M-1A - Land-based Transport.
-
Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., and Tanabe K. 2006. “2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.” IGES, Japan. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html. ↩↩